In early 2010, I learned that Medicaid could be used as a secondary insurance. I was surprised, and to be honest had never thought of using social programs--those were to help the poor.
Well, more often than not, students fall into the 'poor' category, something I had failed to realize before that point.
So, Ryan and I looked into it, and decided that we should pursue Medicaid as a secondary insurance for February 2010--the month Adrielle was born.
In retrospect, that was an
inspired decision because $25,000 day-of-birth expenses later, DMBA covered 80% and Medicaid covered the last 20%--more than $5,000. What a blessing.
I was thinking about Medicaid this week. My colleague and I participated in an
Influencer training this week and the concept of perverse incentives came up. (According to Wikipedia, a perverse incentive is an incentive that has an unintended and undesirable result which is contrary to the interests of the incentive makers.)
In other words, they are unintended consequences...
So, during our discussion about perverse incentives, my colleague mentioned her 10+ years working for the Department of Workforce Services for the state of Utah. She said that often, individuals who are benefiting from social programs often refuse better jobs or raises because it would increase their income, bump them out of the social program range, and decrease their buying power.
In other words, people stay on welfare or other social programs because of the equivalent dollar amount of services they are receiving...
In other words, these social programs have created perverse incentives.
Over the past few days, I have reflected on the benefits of social programs. I've thought about the difference between sustained poverty and what I've observed as "student poverty". I've thought about the need to lighten the burdens of others and do as the Savior would do. I have also thought about those who take advantage of the system and those who give back to the system.
I looked up the purpose of the
Church Welfare system: to help members to become self-reliant and to care for the poor and needy.
I remembered the family who rented my parents house. It started out smoothly, but then they started missing payments. They went months without paying while obviously spending money elsewhere, then one day (after legal action), they finally paid. It wasn't until my mom checked her bank account that she discovered the payment had come from the Church Welfare system.
I thought about what it means to be honest. A few weeks ago in Relief Society I learned a completely new concept from the Gospel Principles manual on honesty: taking more than our share of anything is stealing.
And to be completely candid (because I'm in the sharing mood), as I did my June budget this morning I became disappointed realizing that some choose to take advantage of social programs for the money, rather than using them to become self-reliant.
The Welfare systems (both secular and religious) beg the questions of how much, how often, and when; but we as good citizens and members of the Church must realize that it is our initiative, our self-reliance, and our honesty that enable those trapped in sustained poverty to emerge from the cycle and become self-reliant.
5 comments:
Love this post! Such a great perspective and one that I've been thinking a lot about too lately. Glad to read your thoughts on the matter :-)
Great post, McKenzie. Greg's grandpa was telling us yesterday that about 1/3 of America is on some sort of welfare!
Very nice post. I've had several conversations with friends and family about state welfare. My student friends and I have used state insurance/food stamps/WIC to one degree or another, and we noted that the amount of money given in food stamps was often 2x or more greater than what we had been budgeting before using the program. It's because so many people use that money for frozen prepared foods, instead of ingredients to make their own meals.
I know there's a lot of red tape involved, but we discussed how we could see the benefits in reducing the amount of money given out each month in food stamps, and providing those people with a once or twice a month class on how to prepare healthy meals for the family (possibly making it a requirement to receive the food stamps). In fact, after this discussion, my friend wrote a letter to our congressman about reducing the money provided in food stamps. A family of THREE was getting nearly $500/month! (Granted, I don't know if that's the case for all families of 3; there are adjustments made based on earnings.) Another friend pointed out that if you qualify for food stamps, your children automatically qualify for free school breakfasts and lunches (at least in AZ) so parents don't even have to pay for 2 of their school aged children's meals with that food stamp money - and that's even continued in the summer if they're going to "camp" (aka day care at the school) all summer.
We think WIC is the best developed to avoid perverse incentives. I think that is partially due to the limits it has on what is provided in their program. And yet, they still manage to provide so much! :)
Very interesting post...definitely things that Kyle and I think about a lot since we are on medicaid and wic. These programs have seriously saved our butts in so many ways! We've felt tremendous gratitude that we have access to them. With Kyle's new job, we may not qualify any longer and are excited to get on our own feet again. But it is tough to think that so many people view the program as a free ride, rather than as a temporary solution to tough times. Can't seem to come up with any realistic solutions to the problem...
Loved this!
Post a Comment